HSUS’s Inefficient Animal Care

mardi 2 septembre 2014

The PR flacks for the Humane Society of the United States like to falsely claim that HSUS is the “most effective animal protection organization” in the United States. We know that’s false because HSUS regularly gets “D” and “C-minus” grades from the American Institute of Philanthropy for spending so much of its money on overhead. HSUS spends millions sending out ankle socks and other direct-mail doodads that the group could be using to care for the needy pets in its commercial. And we won’t even get into the $16 million racketeering and bribery settlement from earlier this year.

But nevertheless, HSUS claims to provide more direct care for animals than any other group. HSUS and its affiliate organizations had a combined budget of about $165 million in 2013. And between them, HSUS claims to have cared for about 170,000 animals last year, or a cost of about $1,000 per animal provided “direct care.”

Let’s add a few caveats: It’s unclear what exactly “direct care” means. HSUS doesn’t run a single pet shelter anywhere, so it*s not as if “direct care” simply means long-term care of dogs and cats. Further, it’s unclear whether or not that counts spay-neuters conducted by other groups under the banner of HSUS’s “World Spay Day.” Further, the animals HSUS rescues are often dumped off on other groups for longer-term care and adoption. So for all we know, “direct care” is simply a pat or a head-scratch or short-term transport. (HSUS is a group that paid a witness who lied in federal court, after all, so intellectual honesty isn’t necessarily a major value of the top br$#@!.)

And how does HSUS stack up to other groups? Not well.

But we decided to survey local humane societies to see how many animals they cared for. And we discovered that, conglomerating their efforts, for $162 million they care for over three times more animals than HSUS claims to.

HSUS may raise a lot of money, but that’s because it’s spending a lot of money on fundraising and benefitting from name confusion. If you need a reason to give local, this is it.































































































Organization Name Budget Animals Helped
Animal Welfare League (Chicago)
$5,808,854


20,000

SPCA of Texas
$12,034,320


46,000

$#@!ociated Humane Societies (NJ)
$8,951,165


15,000

Houston SPCA
$7,375,217


100,000

San Diego Humane Society and SPCA
$19,278,778


10,233

Louisiana SPCA
$6,399,933


16,447

Washington Humane Society (DC)
$6,467,739


43,000

Erie County SPCA (NY)
$6,186,599


15,300

Michigan Humane Society
$16,947,365


85,000

Sacramento SPCA
$7,352,025


30,000

Humane Society of Utah
$3,515,141


11,288

Denver Dumb Friends League
$11,643,716


17568

Humane Society of Missouri
$18,653,992


61,907

Wisconsin Humane Society
$7,390,822


34,000

Animal Humane Society (Minnesota)
$12,778,907


23,242

Arizona Humane Society
$12,053,287


44,000

Total
$162,837,860


572,985







More from HumaneWatch...





HSUS’s Inefficient Animal Care

0 commentaires:

Enregistrer un commentaire