If thats his complaint, Pacelle should point his finger at his own carpetbagging organization. At least 47% of the money opposing HSUS has come from Maine. Meanwhile, only 1% of Yes money has come from Maine, according to the campaign finance records, and 96% of the money has come from HSUS. The HSUS campaign is not even run by a Mainer, but by a Massachusetts lawyer and HSUS employee.
Translation: The anti-bear hunting campaign is a contrived, astroturf initiative that wouldnt even be on the ballot unless HSUS wanted to spend a few million dollars putting it there. This is really about HSUSs agenda to ban all hunting.
Pacelle, of course, doesnt mention the funding disparity on his bloghardly the first instance of intellectual dishonesty at HSUS. And today, theres news of another flop from the HSUS Yes on 1 campaign.
According to the No campaign, the HSUS campaign sent out a mailer and created a Facebook image using grizzly bears. Thats a big faux pas: There are no grizzlies in Maine only black bears. The HSUS campaign is already opposed by Maine wildlife biologists; if HSUS cant even get the species right in its promotional material, it speaks volumes for how little HSUS knows.
Its a reminder too that HSUS is not a group of veterinarians, farmers, wildlife biologists, animal scientists, or other experts. Its a group of activists with a radical ideology who need to mislead voters in order to overcome expertise. In Maine, HSUS comes in with cute pictures of bears to try to sway votesa typical M.O.
Thats not a scientific approach, its a political one. And it may not work in Maineone of the latest polls has HSUS losing by 21 points.
As for Pacelles mental errors, maybe hes overworked, or maybe he has a lack of B12 in his diet. Or perhaps he sees his campaign going down in flames. Well see on Tuesday.
More from HumaneWatch...
Brainless Baiting in Maine
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire