In a 2010 report entitled The Nations Worst Attorney Generals, the Competitive Enterprise Institute evaluated four criteria and gave Edmondson a failing grade in each of them: Ethical Breaches and Selective Application of the Law, Fabricating Law, Usurping Legislative Powers, and Predatory Practices.
Noting that Edmondsons time as Oklahomas attorney general was marked by a pattern of political bullying and hypocrisy, the report went on to criticize Edmondson for accepting campaign cash from out-of-state lawyers, wealthy special interests, and even felons. Read the full report*here.
HSUS asking a former officeholder who was given a failing grade for predatory practices to help avoid accountability for*its own deceptive fundraising*techniques is certainly an interesting choice, but Edmonson and HSUS seemed well-suited for each other. Considering his record as attorney general, its not entirely surprising that Edmondson would help HSUS*avoid accountability for*misleading its own donors.*And given HSUSs history of irresponsible spending, potentially*misleading federal courts, and*fundraising off of natural disasters, were not shocked they asked the nations third worst attorney general for help.
More from HumaneWatch...
HSUSs Legal Rep Has a Bad Rap
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire